Here’s something you may not know when it comes to the business of distributing and paying for PKU formula.
After trying the free sample of RESTORE LITE provided to me by Cambrooke Foods, I immediately connected with my clinic to have it added to my formula prescription. Apria Healthcare, which is the medical supply company that processes and ships my formula, called and told me, “We do not carry RESTORE LITE. We carry the regular RESTORE, but not the LITE.” After reporting this news back to my clinic, we decided to try Edgepark, a competitor of Apria Healthcare. What was Edgepark’s response? Not only does Edgepark not carry RESTORE LITE, they cannot carry the LITE because Apria, EdgePark and other “durable medical equipment” companies are reimbursed according to the number of calories in the formula.
Call me crazy, but billing insurance carriers based on caloric value seems ridiculous, so while my dietician continues to search for an alternative medical supply company from which I can order my preferred formula, I decided to investigate this a little further.
A basic keyword Internet search turned up a 56-page document created by Abbott Nutrition and titled “Medicare Part B Enteral Nutrition Reimbursement Manual, 9th Edition.” Abbott Nutrition, which creates powdered PKU formulas such as Phenex-1 and Phenex-2, created this manual as a way to guide health care suppliers through the process of billing the U.S. federal health insurance program called Medicare. Here’s how the process is explained on page 9 of the manual:
Enteral nutrition formula is billed in “units.” A unit is defined as 100 Calories.
- Calculation of units: Cal per day ÷ 100 = units per day
- e.g., 6 cans/day x 250 Cal/can = 1500 Cal/day ÷ 100 = 15 units/day
- 15 units per day x 30 days per month = 450 units per month
Sound all Greek to you? Well, it does to me too. It appears that billing formula based on calories is a government-mandated method, but why (if I am not on Medicare) does it apply to me? Do durable medical equipment supply companies decide to apply this method across the board since they are already required to do so for Medicare patients? And what does that mean on a personal level? Do PKU patients now have to decide whether eating healthier is worth what is likely a significant increase in cost?
This way of thinking–whether it originates with the U.S. Government or with the medical supply companies–sounds all too familiar. For years, PKU patients have struggled with medical foods coverage based in large part on the incorrect assumption that a low-protein diet is cosmetic and only for achieving weight-loss.
Despite calorie count, medical formula is medical formula. Period.
If anyone from Cambrooke and/or Abbott Nutrition are reading this blog, I’d love to hear another perspective on this formula conundrum in the comment field below. Hopefully someone can explain why the 100-calorie difference you see between regular RESTORE and RESTORE LITE ultimately determines whether a patient in need receives their medical formula.